BVM vs KHT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BVM (Allbatross Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon) and KHT (Allbatross Portföy Kartal Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | BVM | KHT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −1.70% | −4.19% | −1.76% |
| Daily | 0.30% | −2.50% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | −1.09% | −15.75% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −4.86% | −35.80% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | −9.35% | −40.41% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 9.61% | −37.39% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 1.90% | −25.93% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | −64.76% | −55.06% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | −56.94% | −7.99% | 111.64% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the BVM vs KHT comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BVM (Allbatross Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon) and KHT (Allbatross Portföy Kartal Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BVM leads in 8 and KHT leads in 3. BVM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Allbatross Portföy Yönetimi Anonim Şirketi; KHT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Allbatross Portföy Yönetimi Anonim Şirketi.
Highlights: Today (est.): BVM leads (−1.70% vs −4.19%). Daily: BVM leads (0.30% vs −2.50%). 1 week: BVM leads (−1.09% vs −15.75%). 1 month: BVM leads (−4.86% vs −35.80%). 3 months: BVM leads (−9.35% vs −40.41%). 6 months: BVM leads (9.61% vs −37.39%). YTD: BVM leads (1.90% vs −25.93%). 1 year: KHT leads (−55.06% vs −64.76%). 3 years: KHT leads (−7.99% vs −56.94%). Size (TRY): BVM leads (4.9M vs 3.7M). Investors: KHT leads (166 vs 108).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, BVM or KHT?
Year to date BVM returned 1.90% and KHT returned −25.93%; over the last year BVM returned −64.76% and KHT returned −55.06%. Over the last month BVM returned −4.86% and KHT returned −35.80%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BVM or KHT?
As of September 28, 2026, BVM has a size of TRY 4.9M with 108 investors, while KHT has a size of TRY 3.7M with 166 investors. BVM leads in size and KHT leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BVM and KHT mean?
The CMB risk score of BVM is 7 out of 7 and that of KHT is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.