Yatırımcı.AI

BSM vs YSL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BSM (Global Md Portföy Berrak Serbest Fon) and YSL (Yapı Kredi Portföy Kar Payı Ödeyen Kira Sertifikaları Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

BSMYSL
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BSM vs YSL Fund Comparison
MetricBSMYSLCategory median
Daily0.11%−0.01%0.19%
1 week0.91%0.08%0.42%
1 month4.02%0.74%0.94%
3 months13.71%1.95%5.89%
6 months36.02%8.57%12.86%
YTD61.56%7.28%18.07%
1 year—12.52%24.44%
3 years—62.54%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BSM vs YSL Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BSM (Global Md Portföy Berrak Serbest Fon) and YSL (Yapı Kredi Portföy Kar Payı Ödeyen Kira Sertifikaları Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, BSM leads in 8 and YSL leads in 1. BSM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Global Md Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YSL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BSM leads (0.11% vs −0.01%). 1 week: BSM leads (0.91% vs 0.08%). 1 month: BSM leads (4.02% vs 0.74%). 3 months: BSM leads (13.71% vs 1.95%). 6 months: BSM leads (36.02% vs 8.57%). YTD: BSM leads (61.56% vs 7.28%). Size (TRY): BSM leads (690.4M vs 681.5M). Investors: BSM leads (1,411 vs 367). Risk: YSL leads (0 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BSM returned 61.56% and YSL returned 7.28%; over the last year BSM returned — and YSL returned 12.52%. Over the last month BSM returned 4.02% and YSL returned 0.74%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, BSM has a size of TRY 690.4M with 1,411 investors, while YSL has a size of TRY 681.5M with 367 investors. BSM leads in size and BSM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BSM is 7 out of 7 and that of YSL is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.