Yatırımcı.AI

BLD vs TCC Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BLD (Deniz Portföy Balev Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and TCC (Tacirler Portföy Serbest ( Döviz ) Fon) side by side.

BLDTCC
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

BLD vs TCC Fund Comparison
MetricBLDTCCCategory median
Daily0.29%0.89%0.19%
1 week0.70%2.26%0.42%
1 month3.11%1.75%0.94%
3 months9.92%14.92%5.89%
6 months21.38%24.46%12.86%
YTD31.71%21.36%18.07%
1 year45.36%26.05%24.44%
3 years—129.59%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the BLD vs TCC comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BLD (Deniz Portföy Balev Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and TCC (Tacirler Portföy Serbest ( Döviz ) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BLD leads in 5 and TCC leads in 5. BLD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.ş; TCC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Tacirler Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: TCC leads (0.89% vs 0.29%). 1 week: TCC leads (2.26% vs 0.70%). 1 month: BLD leads (3.11% vs 1.75%). 3 months: TCC leads (14.92% vs 9.92%). 6 months: TCC leads (24.46% vs 21.38%). YTD: BLD leads (31.71% vs 21.36%). 1 year: BLD leads (45.36% vs 26.05%). Size (TRY): TCC leads (399M vs 395.6M). Investors: BLD leads (670 vs 352). Risk: BLD leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date BLD returned 31.71% and TCC returned 21.36%; over the last year BLD returned 45.36% and TCC returned 26.05%. Over the last month BLD returned 3.11% and TCC returned 1.75%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, BLD has a size of TRY 395.6M with 670 investors, while TCC has a size of TRY 399M with 352 investors. TCC leads in size and BLD leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BLD is 2 out of 7 and that of TCC is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.