BHS vs GZR Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BHS (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Sürdürülebilirlik Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GZR (Garanti Portföy Sürdürülebilirlik Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | BHS | GZR | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | −1.95% | −2.45% |
| Daily | 0.33% | 0.11% | 0.47% |
| 1 week | 0.34% | −0.46% | −0.04% |
| 1 month | −0.84% | −4.16% | −5.83% |
| 3 months | 3.69% | −2.94% | −2.72% |
| 6 months | 15.46% | 6.41% | 8.69% |
| YTD | 26.00% | 20.64% | 19.95% |
| 1 year | 32.61% | 20.96% | 22.69% |
| 3 years | 135.29% | 90.08% | 94.93% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the BHS vs GZR comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BHS (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Sürdürülebilirlik Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GZR (Garanti Portföy Sürdürülebilirlik Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BHS leads in 9 and GZR leads in 1. BHS is a Stock Fund fund managed by Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş.; GZR is a Stock Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: BHS leads (0.33% vs 0.11%). 1 week: BHS leads (0.34% vs −0.46%). 1 month: BHS leads (−0.84% vs −4.16%). 3 months: BHS leads (3.69% vs −2.94%). 6 months: BHS leads (15.46% vs 6.41%). YTD: BHS leads (26.00% vs 20.64%). 1 year: BHS leads (32.61% vs 20.96%). 3 years: BHS leads (135.29% vs 90.08%). Size (TRY): GZR leads (1B vs 1B). Investors: BHS leads (24,865 vs 1,896).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, BHS or GZR?
Year to date BHS returned 26.00% and GZR returned 20.64%; over the last year BHS returned 32.61% and GZR returned 20.96%. Over the last month BHS returned −0.84% and GZR returned −4.16%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BHS or GZR?
As of September 28, 2026, BHS has a size of TRY 1B with 24,865 investors, while GZR has a size of TRY 1B with 1,896 investors. GZR leads in size and BHS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BHS and GZR mean?
The CMB risk score of BHS is 6 out of 7 and that of GZR is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.