Yatırımcı.AI

BFT vs SSS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BFT (Azimut Portföy Banka ve Finans Sektörü Hisse Senedi Fonu) and SSS (Yapı Kredi Portföy Savunma Sanayii Şirketleri Endeksi Hisse Senedi Fonu) side by side.

BFTSSS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BFT vs SSS Fund Comparison
MetricBFTSSSCategory median
Today (est.)−1.59%−2.99%−2.94%
Daily−0.04%0.33%0.47%
1 week−0.06%−0.63%−0.04%
1 month−1.14%−6.51%−5.83%
3 months−5.12%−4.44%−2.72%
6 months4.14%2.96%8.69%
YTD5.63%15.03%19.95%
1 year18.16%10.13%22.69%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 14:02.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BFT vs SSS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BFT (Azimut Portföy Banka ve Finans Sektörü Hisse Senedi Fonu) and SSS (Yapı Kredi Portföy Savunma Sanayii Şirketleri Endeksi Hisse Senedi Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BFT leads in 5 and SSS leads in 5. BFT is a Stock Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SSS is a Stock Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Today (est.): BFT leads (−1.59% vs −2.99%). Daily: SSS leads (0.33% vs −0.04%). 1 week: BFT leads (−0.06% vs −0.63%). 1 month: BFT leads (−1.14% vs −6.51%). 3 months: SSS leads (−4.44% vs −5.12%). 6 months: BFT leads (4.14% vs 2.96%). YTD: SSS leads (15.03% vs 5.63%). 1 year: BFT leads (18.16% vs 10.13%). Size (TRY): SSS leads (209.4M vs 206.5M). Investors: SSS leads (4,831 vs 546).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BFT returned 5.63% and SSS returned 15.03%; over the last year BFT returned 18.16% and SSS returned 10.13%. Over the last month BFT returned −1.14% and SSS returned −6.51%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, BFT has a size of TRY 206.5M with 546 investors, while SSS has a size of TRY 209.4M with 4,831 investors. SSS leads in size and SSS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BFT is 6 out of 7 and that of SSS is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.