ANZ vs RLH Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ANZ (Ata Portföy Dördüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and RLH (Rota Portföy Yirminci Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | ANZ | RLH | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.25% | 0.38% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | −0.49% | 0.77% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −0.81% | 2.09% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 3.02% | 8.36% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 10.56% | 18.30% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 12.76% | 37.20% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 19.45% | 47.39% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | 110.71% | — | 111.64% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the ANZ vs RLH Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of ANZ (Ata Portföy Dördüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and RLH (Rota Portföy Yirminci Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ANZ leads in 2 and RLH leads in 8. ANZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RLH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: RLH leads (0.38% vs −0.25%). 1 week: RLH leads (0.77% vs −0.49%). 1 month: RLH leads (2.09% vs −0.81%). 3 months: RLH leads (8.36% vs 3.02%). 6 months: RLH leads (18.30% vs 10.56%). YTD: RLH leads (37.20% vs 12.76%). 1 year: RLH leads (47.39% vs 19.45%). Size (TRY): RLH leads (262M vs 250.4M). Investors: ANZ leads (136 vs 35). Risk: ANZ leads (0 vs 2).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, ANZ or RLH?
Year to date ANZ returned 12.76% and RLH returned 37.20%; over the last year ANZ returned 19.45% and RLH returned 47.39%. Over the last month ANZ returned −0.81% and RLH returned 2.09%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, ANZ or RLH?
As of September 28, 2026, ANZ has a size of TRY 250.4M with 136 investors, while RLH has a size of TRY 262M with 35 investors. RLH leads in size and ANZ leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of ANZ and RLH mean?
The CMB risk score of ANZ is 0 out of 7 and that of RLH is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.