AJP vs GID Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AJP (Axa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Atak Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GID (Garanti Portföy İnşaat Sektörü Hisse Senedi Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | AJP | GID | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | −3.21% | −1.91% |
| Daily | 0.68% | 1.03% | 0.32% |
| 1 week | 0.47% | 0.74% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −1.87% | −13.03% | −1.48% |
| 3 months | 7.34% | −8.34% | 4.48% |
| 6 months | 12.98% | −3.63% | 14.82% |
| YTD | 29.51% | 4.96% | 25.33% |
| 1 year | 35.40% | 10.16% | 35.72% |
| 3 years | 170.14% | 11.18% | 161.05% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the AJP vs GID comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of AJP (Axa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Atak Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GID (Garanti Portföy İnşaat Sektörü Hisse Senedi Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AJP leads in 7 and GID leads in 3. AJP is a Variable Fund fund managed by Axa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; GID is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GID leads (1.03% vs 0.68%). 1 week: GID leads (0.74% vs 0.47%). 1 month: AJP leads (−1.87% vs −13.03%). 3 months: AJP leads (7.34% vs −8.34%). 6 months: AJP leads (12.98% vs −3.63%). YTD: AJP leads (29.51% vs 4.96%). 1 year: AJP leads (35.40% vs 10.16%). 3 years: AJP leads (170.14% vs 11.18%). Size (TRY): AJP leads (33.1M vs 31.2M). Investors: GID leads (1,780 vs 443).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, AJP or GID?
Year to date AJP returned 29.51% and GID returned 4.96%; over the last year AJP returned 35.40% and GID returned 10.16%. Over the last month AJP returned −1.87% and GID returned −13.03%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, AJP or GID?
As of September 28, 2026, AJP has a size of TRY 33.1M with 443 investors, while GID has a size of TRY 31.2M with 1,780 investors. AJP leads in size and GID leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of AJP and GID mean?
The CMB risk score of AJP is 5 out of 7 and that of GID is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.