Yatırımcı.AI

AFA vs GCN Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AFA (Ak Portföy Amerika Yabancı Hisse Senedi Fonu) and GCN (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Yeni Teknolojiler Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

AFAGCN
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

AFA vs GCN Fund Comparison
MetricAFAGCNCategory median
Daily0.63%1.10%0.47%
1 week1.54%0.38%−0.04%
1 month2.34%−7.57%−5.83%
3 months14.27%−2.42%−2.72%
6 months35.89%23.23%8.69%
YTD30.56%35.77%19.95%
1 year42.04%40.28%22.69%
3 years227.75%232.14%94.93%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the AFA vs GCN Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AFA (Ak Portföy Amerika Yabancı Hisse Senedi Fonu) and GCN (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Yeni Teknolojiler Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, AFA leads in 5 and GCN leads in 6. AFA is a Stock Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GCN is a Stock Fund fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GCN leads (1.10% vs 0.63%). 1 week: AFA leads (1.54% vs 0.38%). 1 month: AFA leads (2.34% vs −7.57%). 3 months: AFA leads (14.27% vs −2.42%). 6 months: AFA leads (35.89% vs 23.23%). YTD: GCN leads (35.77% vs 30.56%). 1 year: AFA leads (42.04% vs 40.28%). 3 years: GCN leads (232.14% vs 227.75%). Size (TRY): GCN leads (5.7B vs 5.5B). Investors: GCN leads (73,198 vs 46,068). Risk: GCN leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date AFA returned 30.56% and GCN returned 35.77%; over the last year AFA returned 42.04% and GCN returned 40.28%. Over the last month AFA returned 2.34% and GCN returned −7.57%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, AFA has a size of TRY 5.5B with 46,068 investors, while GCN has a size of TRY 5.7B with 73,198 investors. GCN leads in size and GCN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AFA is 6 out of 7 and that of GCN is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.