Yatırımcı.AI

ACD vs GZH Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ACD (İstanbul Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and GZH (Garanti Portföy Temiz Enerji Değişken Fon) side by side.

ACDGZH
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ACD vs GZH Fund Comparison
MetricACDGZHCategory median
Today (est.)−1.65%—−2.44%
Daily0.07%1.29%0.32%
1 week−0.83%0.36%0.42%
1 month−3.24%−3.20%−1.48%
3 months0.75%−6.95%4.48%
6 months16.19%3.84%14.82%
YTD24.08%21.17%25.33%
1 year29.85%36.02%35.72%
3 years159.75%86.91%161.05%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 14:31.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ACD vs GZH Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ACD (İstanbul Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and GZH (Garanti Portföy Temiz Enerji Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ACD leads in 5 and GZH leads in 5. ACD is a Variable Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GZH is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GZH leads (1.29% vs 0.07%). 1 week: GZH leads (0.36% vs −0.83%). 1 month: GZH leads (−3.20% vs −3.24%). 3 months: ACD leads (0.75% vs −6.95%). 6 months: ACD leads (16.19% vs 3.84%). YTD: ACD leads (24.08% vs 21.17%). 1 year: GZH leads (36.02% vs 29.85%). 3 years: ACD leads (159.75% vs 86.91%). Size (TRY): ACD leads (341M vs 338.1M). Investors: GZH leads (5,176 vs 1,375).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ACD returned 24.08% and GZH returned 21.17%; over the last year ACD returned 29.85% and GZH returned 36.02%. Over the last month ACD returned −3.24% and GZH returned −3.20%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, ACD has a size of TRY 341M with 1,375 investors, while GZH has a size of TRY 338.1M with 5,176 investors. ACD leads in size and GZH leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ACD is 5 out of 7 and that of GZH is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.